great wave off kanagawa

Show us what you have made with our Pic Software.
Forum rules
Be Kind to other's.
No Cussing or Swearing.
Don't post anything Illegal or Obscene.
Image attachment size limit is 500 KiB.
atrueresistance
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:22 pm

great wave off kanagawa

Postby atrueresistance » Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:45 pm

Thank you for the help! First success. Using the analog/pwm with emblaser settings. Took around 6 hours to complete.

http://imgur.com/6Q5fxj5

User avatar
Picengravertoo
Full Access Moderator
Posts: 1091
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:02 pm
Contact:

Re: great wave off kanagawa

Postby Picengravertoo » Mon Nov 09, 2015 6:10 am

Very impressive results! What size is the engraving? The reason I ask, because the time it took to engrave it seems quite long. Can you post more specific details of your PEP5 settings and the type of wood it's engraved on?

Thanks.
Jeff

atrueresistance
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:22 pm

Re: great wave off kanagawa

Postby atrueresistance » Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:05 am

( Analog + Feed Rate )
( 25.0% Feed Rate Change )
( 2794.0000 units/min. )
( Image size in mm: 198.882w x 198.882h )
( Pixel Resolution: 0.254 mm )
( Line Spacing: 0.254 mm )
( Max. Cut Depth: 12000.0000 mm )
( Min. Cut Depth: .0000 mm )
( 3rd Axis Safe Position: 0 mm )
( Start Position: image center )
( Horizontal Axis Offset: 0 mm )
( Vertical Axis Offset: 0 mm )
( Engraving Angle: Left 45° )
( Spindle On/Off Enabled )
( GRBL Code w/G28 EOF )
( Metric Mode )
( X Axis Align 0 )
( Y Axis Align 0 )

The wood is baltic birch ply

User avatar
Picengravertoo
Full Access Moderator
Posts: 1091
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:02 pm
Contact:

Re: great wave off kanagawa

Postby Picengravertoo » Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:49 am

OK, that was a fairly large engraving. Did you use Skip White also and if so, was there pure white in the original image that cutdown on your engraving time?

I notice your using a fairly large Pixel Resolution. Are you using a G2 lens, or a 3 element glass?

You may want to look at the J-Tech Photonics lens. It will give you a smaller focal point like the 3EG, but 30% more burning power.

http://jtechphotonics.com/?product=high ... oated-lens

atrueresistance
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:22 pm

Re: great wave off kanagawa

Postby atrueresistance » Wed Nov 11, 2015 11:26 am

Picengravertoo wrote:OK, that was a fairly large engraving. Did you use Skip White also and if so, was there pure white in the original image that cutdown on your engraving time?

I notice your using a fairly large Pixel Resolution. Are you using a G2 lens, or a 3 element glass?

You may want to look at the J-Tech Photonics lens. It will give you a smaller focal point like the 3EG, but 30% more burning power.

http://jtechphotonics.com/?product=high ... oated-lens


Should be white.. I used inkscape to trace bitmap, with remove background checked, exported as PNG. Then resave as jpg to open in PE5. Sometimes opening a PNG directly exported from inkscape results in a curropted PNG. Skip whitespace was checked.

The lens is a 3 element, but I might look into the lens you provided. Should I be using a smaller pixel resolution and running faster?

User avatar
Picengravertoo
Full Access Moderator
Posts: 1091
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:02 pm
Contact:

Re: great wave off kanagawa

Postby Picengravertoo » Wed Nov 11, 2015 2:23 pm

If your getting results your happy with using that Pixel Resolution, it will generate less lines of gcode and save on engraving time. The single element glass lens from J-Tech will give you more burning power, so an increase in the feedrate could be used. We have been using a 3" focal distance from LD module face to material with our laser engraving machines with any type of lens we use. What's your focal distance set at?

Yes, the png removed background and then saved as a jpg should have been only white in the background, so it should have optimized the toolpath around the white outside areas.

atrueresistance
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:22 pm

Re: great wave off kanagawa

Postby atrueresistance » Fri Nov 13, 2015 12:07 am

I was way above 3" focal point.


Return to “Gallery”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron